LiveCode Forums.

Thanks Klaus

It's the opaque of the group that's doing it -- not what I was expecting.

basilisk

I have a group made of two graphic shapes. When another graphics object is "behind" this group, the back object seems to be clipped by an invisible border around the front group, which extends a few pixels beyond the rect of the biggest object. If I ungroup the front group this behaviour goes away a...

Hi Mark I think we're on the same page as regards UML, but that wasn't my question. OOP (a la Java) is the dominant programming paradigm, used by many thousands of programmers around the world. Telling them that LiveCode cannot cope with conventional software design is not a great selling point. I'm...

Another newcomer's question. Does anyone have ideas about how to map a "conventional" OO design (aimed at languages like Java) to LiveCode? For example, what do OO Classes and Objects correspond to in LiveCode? LiveCode uses the word Object, but it means something different. Specifically, if I have ...

Thanks Mark

I assume you meant (one stack with one card) (for each task) and not (one stack) (with one card for each task).

Basilisk

A newcomers question. If I want a main window with a variety of dialogs that come up from time to time, it seems that I could take two approaches:
(a) one stack with lots of cards
(b) lots of stacks with one card each
Which would be the best approach, and why?