LiveCode Forums.

Hello,
It's great that LiveCode is smart enough to select the latest version of Java, and the latest Android Studio Setup Checklist is also excellent. If it could now explain what to do when a JDK filepath is not reported underneath, that would be even greater.
jaui

For anyone who also has the JDK Path (none) problem. This tip from Alice from LiveCode helped: As a workaround, you can do the following: 1. Open the settings and go to Mobile Support 2. Run the following command in the message box: set the visible of button "chooseJDK" of card "Mobile Support" of s...

Hi,
Yes, I’ve completely removed Java 8 from my system and confirmed that no traces remain.

Klaus I have submitted a bug report and here’s a short summary for the forum: On Windows 11, LiveCode 10.0.3 rc-1 fails to detect JDK 11 (Oracle or Adoptium/Temurin). The JDK Path in Preferences → Mobile Support always remains (none), even though JAVA_HOME, PATH, and registry keys are correctly set ...

HP Laptop 17-cn0xxx, Win 11, Java 11, Android Studio Narwhal, LiveCode 10.0.3 rc-1. I have diligently followed every step of the LiveCode and Android Studio lesson (even unchecking obsolete files) x times (also with Win10). But I always get Path (none). In my frustration, I asked an LLM and got this...

Yes, Google now requires API 35 or higher, and now starts the frustrating game with LiveCode, which is still stuck at API 34 and does not accept API 35 and certainly not the API36 already available in Android Studio to build an aab.file.

Thank you again for your extremely informative answer. "LiveCode 9 6 5 with Android App Bundle for Play Store" of Sept. 23 by P.M. says: "All you have to do now is check the “Build App Bundle” checkbox in the Android Standalone Settings. This will produce a .aab file, together with the .apk file. Yo...

jacque, Thank you for you insightful answer. I am not at all an expert but still built an app, tested it, had it pass the Google Review, it was available on Google Play and worked fin. Thereafter, starting from the same LiveCode code (which worked fine as apk) I built the aab, it passed the Review, ...

Experienced the same problem yesterday as Neta in comment 18/19 of quality report under Bug 22251 I used this tools: LiveCode 9-6-5 (rc 3) Java 8 Android 11-0 - API 30 Android SDK Build tools 32 rc-1. (all with arcticFox) The app crashed on my galaxy S5 Neo with aab-file however worked fine as apk-f...

I can build with 9-6-1 however then you need SDK 13-5 which is coming with Xcode 11-5. And I got a rejection because I did not use the latest Xcode, which is 12-1. So I submitted again with 9-6-2 RC-1 and Xcode 12-1 , and as you say, most probably now I will get a rejection because I submitted the s...

No problem, I can try 9-6-1. But I shall wait with that for a while, because right now I got good news from App Store Review that "Your app...has been approved for beta testing", whatever that means for the entire process. Thank you anyhow for your help till now! - I Shall keep you informed how it i...

I tested it 1. with my Mac bigsur 11-1, Simulator version 12-1, simulated was an iPhone 8, iOS 14-1 2. with Test Flight on my iPad iOS 12-5 3. with Test Flight on my iPhone iOS 14-3 No, I am sorry I can't tell you where and when my app crashed, because it never crashed on any of my device. Could it ...

Hi, please help: I used LC 9-6-2 - rc-1 Indy SDKs 14-1 Xcode 12-1 The app runs perfect on Win, Mac, Android and even iOS Test Flight, nevertheless from App Store review I get: Guideline 2-1 - Performance - App Completeness We were unable to review your app as it crashed on launch. Does anybody know ...

Hi David,
Thanks for your question and answer - I had the same problem and your solution saved me a lot of time - but how did you find out, you had to set 9 (I used 10) instead of 8 ?
Rainer