LiveCode Forums.

Posted: **Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:03 am**

Hi All,

I have done a revlet with a stack and a substack (the substack contains 64 images)

It work well

(in local using with safari on OSX only at this moment)

I see that the size of the revlet is much smaller than the size of the standalone (4.2 Mo for the revlet and 14.5 Mo for the OSX standalone)

Why ?

All the best

Jean-Marc

Posted: **Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:32 am**

Bonjour jean-Marc,

the main difference is that the standalone engine is NOT attached to a Revlet.
(= ca. 6.5 MB for the Mac OS universal standalone engine)
The installed Plug-in is the engine for these stacks!
And probably Revlets are also compressed somehow.

Best

Klaus

Posted: **Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:50 pm**

Guten abend Klaus
Und vielen Dank für hilfe

probably Revlets are also compressed somehow.

I think so. The size of the stack = 4.5 Mo

Best from geneva beach under the rain

Jean-Marc

Posted: **Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:53 pm**

Avec plaisir, mon ami

LiveCode Forums.

why the size of a revlet is so small ?

why the size of a revlet is so small ?

Re: why the size of a revlet is so small ?

Re: why the size of a revlet is so small ?

Re: why the size of a revlet is so small ?