Standalone Application, Xcode 9.2, Livecode 9.0.0

Got a LiveCode personal license? Are you a beginner, hobbyist or educator that's new to LiveCode? This forum is the place to go for help getting started. Welcome!

Moderators: FourthWorld, heatherlaine, Klaus, kevinmiller

Post Reply
jmm123
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:27 am

Standalone Application, Xcode 9.2, Livecode 9.0.0

Post by jmm123 »

Hi,
I am on OSX 10.13 with Xcode 9.2 and Livecode 9.0.0

I can create a simple test application in the iphone Simulator. But when I try to create a standalone application for iOS I get these errors as seen on the attached screenshot.

How do I interpret these error numbers or can someone please point me in the right direction?

Thanks
Attachments
LC Standalone errors
LC Standalone errors
jmburnod
VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
Posts: 2734
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Standalone Application, Xcode 9.2, Livecode 9.0.0

Post by jmburnod »

Hi,
Sorry, no idea about this error message
After your message I tried to compile one of my apps for mobile (OSX 10.13 with Xcode 9.2 and Livecode 9.0.0) without issue.
Best regards
Jean-Marc
https://alternatic.ch
LiveCode_Panos
Livecode Staff Member
Livecode Staff Member
Posts: 870
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 4:03 pm

Re: Standalone Application, Xcode 9.2, Livecode 9.0.0

Post by LiveCode_Panos »

Hi jmm123,

Welcome to the forum.

A rough guess is that you get that msg because the Xcode command line tools are not up to date.

What does the following command return (type it in the terminal):

xcode-select -p

If it does not return a path to xcode9.2, you have to change it.

Try this:

1. Open Xcode 9.2
2. Go to Xcode -> Preferences -> Locations.
3. In Command Line tools, choose Xcode 9.2.
4. Quit LC, open it again and build an iOS standalone.

Please let us know if this fixes the problem.

Best,
Panos
--
jmm123
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:27 am

Re: Standalone Application, Xcode 9.2, Livecode 9.0.0

Post by jmm123 »

Thanks Panos,

That worked brilliantly!

John
Post Reply